Romans 1:18-32

Of all the passages of Scripture in the Bible used to condemn homosexuality, the most frequently used is this one here in Romans.  Some of the words used here have been distorted, but for the most part, the translations we have today appear to be faithful to the Greek and accurate renderings of the text.  The passage is clearly speaking of homosexual acts.  This may at first appear to be an admission that homosexuality is not acceptable to God, but in the context, the passage makes no such blanket condemnation.  Street walkers are commonly seen in cities across America and Europe, soliciting their bodies for money.  There is no blanket condemnation of heterosexuality as the result of the misbehavior of the few.  In the same way, homosexuality in general cannot be condemned on the basis of its abuse by a few.

In the context of this passage, Paul is exposing the practice of the pagan rites of fertility, common in Rome and throughout the known world of the time.  Paul’s concern (rather than a warning against homosexuals) was for the Roman Christian’s involvement in these fertility rites.  In Corinth, where evidently a man was sleeping with his father’s wife and all knew of it (1 Corinthians 5:1), but did nothing about it, Paul took authority, exposing him and requiring his expulsion.  He must have had a similar concern that the Roman Gentile believers, who had formerly been actively involved in the temple cult fertility rites, might continue to do so.  Rather than a blanket condemnation of homosexuality, this passage is a slam against the hypocritical Christians who were themselves continuing to participate in the temple cult orgies.  The participants were not predominantly homosexuals, but heterosexuals participating in homosexual acts.

The people Paul is describing, who are involved in this temple cult worship, have some very distinct characteristics.  First, they have rejected the knowledge of God (verse 20).  Second, they do not glorify God or acknowledge his provision for them and their hearts and minds have become “darkened” (verse 21).  Third, they have exchanged the glory of God for idolatry (verses 22-23).  Fourth, they degrade one another through promiscuous sexual acts (verse 24).  Fifth, they have believed lies, serving created things and not the Creator (verse 25).  Sixth, they have exchanged their own “natural” sexuality for the “unnatural” (verses 26-27).  Seventh, they have depraved minds that promote unbridled lawlessness (verses 28-32).  These are very specific characteristics and while there may be many who fit these descriptions today, this does not describe the modern mainstream homosexual community and for sure does not even come close in describing those gay men and women who are believers, serving the Lord.  The problem here is that many church-goers cannot see the difference between what Paul is describing here and committed loving relationships.  There is a big difference.

In verse 26 and 27, translated to our English word “natural” is the Greek word phusikos (#5446) which means intrinsic; that which is born or inherent.  It does not describe something that is necessarily universally true, but intrinsic for the individual.  What is intrinsic for one person is not necessarily intrinsic for the next person.  For example, one person may be intrinsically tall (as height runs in his/her family) while another person may be intrinsically short.  Both are intrinsically influenced, but not in the same way.  Both are “natural” in their appearance but with opposite results.  Those in this passage, involved in the fertility rites, were giving themselves over to do those things that were not natural (intrinsic) to themselves.  Even the English word “nature” means that which is inborn or inherent to the individual.  The assumption here which causes so much confusion is the belief that Paul was saying that “natural” refers to the heterosexual persuasion; that all humans are naturally heterosexual from birth. This assumption, based on the evidence of experience does not hold true.

Surveys on the incidence of a homosexual orientation in identical twins was done years ago at Johns-Hopkins University.  In all cases where one of the twins was homosexual, the other twin was also.  More recently, in the July 26, 1993 issue of Time Magazine, the Science Editor describes recent findings that lean toward a genetic explanation for homosexuality.  “This new work and the studies of the twins are two lines of evidence pointing in the same direction.  But the DNA evidence is much stronger than the twins study”, according to Simon LeVay whose research on the human brain differences is widely accepted.  Science is progressively confirming what many gay men and women have known all along, they were created that way.