The first five books of the Old Testament are
called the Pentateuch (literally 5 tools). They are traditionally
attributed to Moses’ authorship and contain the Law (Torah). The Law
contains more than six hundred regulations governing everyday living for the
Children of Israel. They cover everything from instructions on how to wear
clothes and prepare ceremonial foods to laws concerning the observance of holy
days and punishments requirements for certain crimes. The Law was
specifically given to the Israelites and never intended to be the law for the
Gentiles. In that sense, none of us have ever been under the Law and there
is no need for us to be under it now.
The Apostle Paul observed that the ones who
have fallen away from grace (Galatians 5:4) are the ones who have put
themselves under the Law. This was sect known as the Judaizers and not
those without the Law. The Law was given to show the righteousness of God
could not be obtained by legalistically keeping rules. It gave the people
knowledge of sin (Romans 3:20) and demonstrated the impossibility of anyone
being able to measure up and be accepted by God on the basis of keeping it.
The major source of condemnation today against
homosexuality and other social moral issues, has come from those who have fully
grasped the significance of the law of Grace as opposed to the Law of Moses and
their belief that homosexuality is a violation of God’s Law. Nearly every
argument against homosexuality has at its root the Law of Moses. They
mistakenly believe that sodomy is forbidden by the Law. This is not
true. The word sodomy is a modern word, coined under the mistaken
belief that Sodom was destroyed because of rampant homosexuality. The word
sodomy does not appear in any of the main translations (KJV, RSV, NASB, or
NIV). It has taken on new meaning in this century referring to any sexual
act other than copulation between a man and a woman who are married to each
other. It varies from state to state in its legal definition. This
variance illustrates one of the prime difficulties in understanding the
Scripture in its original language. To understand and explain what the
writer has written, one must understand the words the writer used as the writer
understood them. Word meanings change over time and the unlearned can come
away from passages with a total misunderstanding of the writer’s meaning.
Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 are the traditional
condemnation passages against homosexual acts and appear in our modern
translations to be clear cut prohibitions. Some have said these passages
would justify capital punishment of homosexuals. Would these people also
bring the same judgment against adulterers (Leviticus 20:10)? Following
suite, they would also have to prescribe the death penalty for their stubborn
and rebellious sons (Deuteronomy 21:18-21). One thing is clear from Paul’s
teaching: anyone who puts themselves under any one point of the Law obligates
themselves to keep the whole Law (Galatians 5:3) or they are worthy of
death.
In truth, it is uncertain what Leviticus 18:22
is saying. The literal transliteration reads:
“You must not sleep the sleep of a woman
with a man; it is ritually impure.”
Many scholars believe this saying represents
an idiom that has lost its meaning over time due to cultural traditions of the
time long since forgotten. John Boswell makes a case in
Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality that this prohibition
cannot be a blanket condemnation of homosexuality, because the writer uses the
Hebrew word toevah *#844) referring to the act as being “detestable” or
an “abomination”. The Hebrews used special words to condemn specific
wicked or abominable misdeeds. If this passage had been referring to
sexual misconduct, the writer would have used the zimmah (#2154) instead
of toevah.
The land was full of idolatry. The
Palestinian god of the sun, Baal and his consort, the fertility goddess
Ashtoreth, were commonly worshipped in the area and toevah appears
throughout the Law to denounce these idolatrous practices. But zimmah
is used wherever immoral acts such as prostitution or rape are the subject.
Whatever detestable acts here are being prohibited have something to do
with idolatry.
In the New Testament, we find that Jesus said
nothing we can identify clearly about homosexuality. Homosexual
relationships in the Greco-Roman world were common place at the time of Jesus.
Had these relationships been so very detestable
to God, certainly Jesus would have commented on them. Surely Paul would
have commented on them. Some believe he did and in our next section we
will consider Paul’s writings.